Can We use Philosophy to Solve our Neomodern Troubles of Today| with PJ Wehry | #20

In this episode of The Neutral Ground Podcast with Dr. Joe Meyer, I sit down with PJ Wehry, co-founder of Candid Goat Productions, which serves two exceptional podcasts: Chasing Leviathan and Wehry Dads. This is a particularly jam-packed show. PJ and I discuss a lot of philosophy: from Kierkegaard and Charles Taylor to John Milton and the Romantics. We talk about trying to wrap our heads around the problem of reconciling private and communal suffering, as they relate to Steven Pinker's work on data. We even get into a bit of Star Wars and the DC comics live-action universe.  Additionally, we spend quite a bit of time talking about how we're supposed to frame knowledge in the book of Job from the Bible. As I said, there is a lot here for you to digest. It's one of the longer episodes I've done, and with good reason.   

For more information about PJ's works, check out the following links:   

Candid Goat Productions: 

Joe Meyer Social Media:

Would you like to support the efforts to bring civility back to meaningful discourse? Well, you can, and with little more than a click of a button.

  1. Subscribe/follow the podcast on whichever platform you're currently using to listen to The Neutral Ground Podcast. 
  2. Leave a rating and a comment wherever applicable. This will really help get the message out to more people. Let a friend know about the podcast by emailing them or posting an episode to your social media accounts.  
  3. Visit the main website for The Neutral Ground Podcast at and send me an email or leave an audio message for me with some thoughts or questions about one of our topics. I might end up using it on the podcast for all of us to grapple with together.  
  4. Buy me a cup of coffee...err...I mean Ko-Fi at Donations are always appreciated and are useful to help fray the costs of maintaining The Neutral Ground Podcast.  
  5. Finally, and most importantly, just be kind and patient with others in conversation. Try to model for those around you the difference between conversation and debate. Debate and dialogue are not the same things. We need more dialogue in our everyday speech, and we need to limit debate to where it is most needed and useful.

Any one of the above items is equally important to me. I am genuinely humbled and moved by the feedback I'm receiving, and the support that I'm getting from all of you. Thank you

--- Send in a voice message: